不同于 Oracle:MySQL 的 insert 会阻塞 update
- 2023-03-28 福建
本文字数:6383 字
阅读完需:约 21 分钟
GreatSQL 社区原创内容未经授权不得随意使用,转载请联系小编并注明来源。
GreatSQL 是 MySQL 的国产分支版本,使用上与 MySQL 一致。
作者: 王庆勋
文章来源:GreatSQL 社区原创
某银行客户在从 Oracle 迁移到 MySQL 的开发中,MySQL 在 READ-COMMITTED 隔离级别下,出现了 insert 阻塞 update 的情况,但同样的情况下,Oracle 的 insert 则不会阻塞 update。本文通过复现该问题,分析 MySQL 的锁信息,确认是 MySQL 与 Oracle 在并发事务处理上的差异,在进行数据库迁移改造的程序开发应予以关注。
1.问题复现
1.1.环境准备
MySQL 版本的 8.0.26,隔离级别是 READ-COMMITTED ,测试表 t 的字段 a 为主键。
mysql> select version();
+-----------+
| version() |
+-----------+
| 8.0.26 |
+-----------+
1 row in set (0.02 sec)
mysql> show variables like 'transaction_isolation';
+-----------------------+----------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+-----------------------+----------------+
| transaction_isolation | READ-COMMITTED |
+-----------------------+----------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> desc t;
+-------+------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+-------+------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| a | int | NO | PRI | NULL | |
| b | int | YES | | NULL | |
+-------+------+------+-----+---------+-------+
2 rows in set (0.01 sec)
mysql> select * from t;
+---+------+
| a | b |
+---+------+
| 7 | 7 |
+---+------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
1.2. insert 阻塞 update 的操作步骤
insert 语句未提交时,update 同样主键的数据会被阻塞。
2.分析原因
2.1.检查事务锁信息
mysql> select * from information_schema.innodb_trx\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
trx_id: 3795
trx_state: LOCK WAIT
trx_started: 2022-10-11 16:03:38
trx_requested_lock_id: 139727275779216:52:4:3:139724882995456
trx_wait_started: 2022-10-11 16:03:38
trx_weight: 2
trx_mysql_thread_id: 9346
trx_query: update t set b=0 where a=8
trx_operation_state: starting index read
trx_tables_in_use: 1
trx_tables_locked: 1
trx_lock_structs: 2
trx_lock_memory_bytes: 1128
trx_rows_locked: 1
trx_rows_modified: 0
trx_concurrency_tickets: 0
trx_isolation_level: READ COMMITTED
trx_unique_checks: 1
trx_foreign_key_checks: 1
trx_last_foreign_key_error: NULL
trx_adaptive_hash_latched: 0
trx_adaptive_hash_timeout: 0
trx_is_read_only: 0
trx_autocommit_non_locking: 0
trx_schedule_weight: 1
*************************** 2. row ***************************
trx_id: 3790
trx_state: RUNNING
trx_started: 2022-10-11 16:03:29
trx_requested_lock_id: NULL
trx_wait_started: NULL
trx_weight: 3
trx_mysql_thread_id: 9320
trx_query: NULL
trx_operation_state: NULL
trx_tables_in_use: 0
trx_tables_locked: 1
trx_lock_structs: 2
trx_lock_memory_bytes: 1128
trx_rows_locked: 1
trx_rows_modified: 1
trx_concurrency_tickets: 0
trx_isolation_level: READ COMMITTED
trx_unique_checks: 1
trx_foreign_key_checks: 1
trx_last_foreign_key_error: NULL
trx_adaptive_hash_latched: 0
trx_adaptive_hash_timeout: 0
trx_is_read_only: 0
trx_autocommit_non_locking: 0
trx_schedule_weight: NULL
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
说明:通过InnoDB的事务表innodb_trx查询到thread_id=9346的事务3795正在等待锁(trx_state: LOCK WAIT),
thread_id=9320的事务3790正在执行(trx_state: RUNNING)。
mysql> select * from performance_schema.data_locks\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
ENGINE: INNODB
ENGINE_LOCK_ID: 139727275779216:1113:139724882998560
ENGINE_TRANSACTION_ID: 3795
THREAD_ID: 9441
EVENT_ID: 5000
OBJECT_SCHEMA: testdb
OBJECT_NAME: t
PARTITION_NAME: NULL
SUBPARTITION_NAME: NULL
INDEX_NAME: NULL
OBJECT_INSTANCE_BEGIN: 139724882998560
LOCK_TYPE: TABLE
LOCK_MODE: IX
LOCK_STATUS: GRANTED
LOCK_DATA: NULL
*************************** 2. row ***************************
ENGINE: INNODB
ENGINE_LOCK_ID: 139727275779216:52:4:3:139724882995456
ENGINE_TRANSACTION_ID: 3795
THREAD_ID: 9441
EVENT_ID: 5012
OBJECT_SCHEMA: testdb
OBJECT_NAME: t
PARTITION_NAME: NULL
SUBPARTITION_NAME: NULL
INDEX_NAME: PRIMARY
OBJECT_INSTANCE_BEGIN: 139724882995456
LOCK_TYPE: RECORD
LOCK_MODE: X,REC_NOT_GAP
LOCK_STATUS: WAITING
LOCK_DATA: 8
*************************** 3. row ***************************
ENGINE: INNODB
ENGINE_LOCK_ID: 139727275781640:1113:139724883017072
ENGINE_TRANSACTION_ID: 3790
THREAD_ID: 9415
EVENT_ID: 15467
OBJECT_SCHEMA: testdb
OBJECT_NAME: t
PARTITION_NAME: NULL
SUBPARTITION_NAME: NULL
INDEX_NAME: NULL
OBJECT_INSTANCE_BEGIN: 139724883017072
LOCK_TYPE: TABLE
LOCK_MODE: IX
LOCK_STATUS: GRANTED
LOCK_DATA: NULL
*************************** 4. row ***************************
ENGINE: INNODB
ENGINE_LOCK_ID: 139727275781640:52:4:3:139724883013968
ENGINE_TRANSACTION_ID: 3790
THREAD_ID: 9441
EVENT_ID: 5007
OBJECT_SCHEMA: testdb
OBJECT_NAME: t
PARTITION_NAME: NULL
SUBPARTITION_NAME: NULL
INDEX_NAME: PRIMARY
OBJECT_INSTANCE_BEGIN: 139724883013968
LOCK_TYPE: RECORD
LOCK_MODE: X,REC_NOT_GAP
LOCK_STATUS: GRANTED
LOCK_DATA: 8
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
说明:事务3795正在等待LOCK_TYPE: RECORD,LOCK_MODE:X,REC_NOT_GAP,等待的主键值为8;
事务3790已获取主键值为8的LOCK_TYPE: RECORD,LOCK_MODE:X,REC_NOT_GAP锁。
mysql> select * from sys.innodb_lock_waits\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
wait_started: 2022-10-11 16:03:38
wait_age: 00:02:50
wait_age_secs: 170
locked_table: `testdb`.`t`
locked_table_schema: testdb
locked_table_name: t
locked_table_partition: NULL
locked_table_subpartition: NULL
locked_index: PRIMARY
locked_type: RECORD
waiting_trx_id: 3795
waiting_trx_started: 2022-10-11 16:03:38
waiting_trx_age: 00:02:50
waiting_trx_rows_locked: 1
waiting_trx_rows_modified: 0
waiting_pid: 9346
waiting_query: update t set b=0 where a=8
waiting_lock_id: 139727275779216:52:4:3:139724882995456
waiting_lock_mode: X,REC_NOT_GAP
blocking_trx_id: 3790
blocking_pid: 9320
blocking_query: NULL
blocking_lock_id: 139727275781640:52:4:3:139724883013968
blocking_lock_mode: X,REC_NOT_GAP
blocking_trx_started: 2022-10-11 16:03:29
blocking_trx_age: 00:02:59
blocking_trx_rows_locked: 1
blocking_trx_rows_modified: 1
sql_kill_blocking_query: KILL QUERY 9320
sql_kill_blocking_connection: KILL 9320
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
说明:事务3795等待testdb.t上的rec_not_gap独占锁,事务3790持有该独占锁。
mysql> select distinct,* from sys.processlist where conn_id in (select trx_mysql_thread_id from information_schema.innodb_trx)\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
thd_id: 9441
conn_id: 9346
user: admin@172.17.128.73
db: testdb
command: Query
state: updating
time: 141
current_statement: update t set b=0 where a=8
statement_latency: 2.37 min
progress: NULL
lock_latency: 431.00 us
rows_examined: 0
rows_sent: 0
rows_affected: 0
tmp_tables: 0
tmp_disk_tables: 0
full_scan: NO
last_statement: NULL
last_statement_latency: NULL
current_memory: 140.15 KiB
last_wait: wait/io/table/sql/handler
last_wait_latency: Still Waiting
source: handler.cc:3250
trx_latency: 13.30 min
trx_state: ACTIVE
trx_autocommit: NO
pid: 9632
program_name: mysql
*************************** 2. row ***************************
thd_id: 9415
conn_id: 9320
user: admin@172.17.128.73
db: testdb
command: Sleep
state: NULL
time: 801
current_statement: NULL
statement_latency: NULL
progress: NULL
lock_latency: 288.00 us
rows_examined: 0
rows_sent: 0
rows_affected: 1
tmp_tables: 0
tmp_disk_tables: 0
full_scan: NO
last_statement: insert into t values(8,8)
last_statement_latency: 765.23 us
current_memory: 218.19 KiB
last_wait: wait/io/socket/sql/client_connection
last_wait_latency: Still Waiting
source: viosocket.cc:146
trx_latency: 13.52 min
trx_state: ACTIVE
trx_autocommit: NO
pid: 9600
program_name: mysql
说明:被阻塞事务执行的sql语句update t set b=0 where a=8,
阻塞事务执行的sql语句是insert into t values(8,8)。
说明:
MySQL 的隔离级别是通过索引上的锁实现并发事务控制的。在 READ-COMMITTED 隔离级别下,session1 在执行 insert 语句时,在主键索引上获取了 a=8 的行记录独占锁,以禁止插入相同主键的数据;session2 如果同时插入相同的主键数据被阻塞,容易理解(Oracle 也同样阻塞)。出于同样的原因 session2 执行 update 时,由于无法获取 a=8 的行记录独占锁,同样也会被阻塞。
2.2.验证 MySQL 事务未提交时已写入数据文件
验证事务未提交时,insert 语句已将数据写入数据文件,索引数据也已生成。
测试表test1
mysql> CREATE TABLE `test1` (
-> `id` int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
-> `k` int NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
-> `c` char(120) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
-> `pad` char(60) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
-> PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
-> KEY `k_1` (`k`)
-> ) ;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.07 sec)
开启一个事务,插入10万条数据。
mysql> begin;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> insert into test1 select * from sbtest1;
Query OK, 100000 rows affected (1.44 sec)
Records: 100000 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
检查表的data_length和index_length
mysql> show table status where name like 'test1'\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Name: test1
Engine: InnoDB
Version: 10
Row_format: Dynamic
Rows: 98712
Avg_row_length: 228
Data_length: 22593536
Max_data_length: 0
Index_length: 2637824
Data_free: 4194304
Auto_increment: 100001
Create_time: 2022-10-11 22:14:50
Update_time: NULL
Check_time: NULL
Collation: utf8mb4_0900_ai_ci
Checksum: NULL
Create_options:
Comment:
1 rows in set (0.01 sec)
回滚insert操作
mysql> rollback;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (1.35 sec)
更新统计信息
mysql> analyze table test1;
再次检查表的data_length和index_length
mysql> show table status where name like 'test1'\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Name: test1
Engine: InnoDB
Version: 10
Row_format: Dynamic
Rows: 0
Avg_row_length: 0
Data_length: 16384
Max_data_length: 0
Index_length: 16384
Data_free: 29360128
Auto_increment: 100001
Create_time: 2022-10-11 22:22:36
Update_time: NULL
Check_time: NULL
Collation: utf8mb4_0900_ai_ci
Checksum: NULL
Create_options:
Comment:
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
检查数据文件的大小
[root@host73 testdb]# ll *test1.ibd
-rw-r----- 1 greatdb greatdb 30408704 Oct 11 15:12 sbtest1.ibd
-rw-r----- 1 greatdb greatdb 33554432 Oct 11 22:24 test1.ibd
说明:
MySQL 在执行 insert 语句进行数据插入,未提交时,数据也已写入表的聚集索引,辅助索引也已生成。MySQL 可以使用未提交数据的索引,通过锁机制实现事务的并发控制。
3.Oracle 中 insert 没有阻塞 update
在 Oracle 中,创建同样的测试表 t,执行同样的 insert 和 update,但 insert 不会阻塞 update。
CREATE TABLE t (
a int NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY ,
b int DEFAULT NULL
);
insert into t values(7,7);
commit;
执行相同的 insert 和 update 语句。
Enjoy GreatSQL :)
关于 GreatSQL
GreatSQL 是由万里数据库维护的 MySQL 分支,专注于提升 MGR 可靠性及性能,支持 InnoDB 并行查询特性,是适用于金融级应用的 MySQL 分支版本。
相关链接: GreatSQL社区 Gitee GitHub Bilibili
GreatSQL 社区:
社区博客有奖征稿详情:https://greatsql.cn/thread-100-1-1.html
技术交流群:
微信:扫码添加
GreatSQL社区助手
微信好友,发送验证信息加群
。
版权声明: 本文为 InfoQ 作者【GreatSQL】的原创文章。
原文链接:【http://xie.infoq.cn/article/702d48f625c359fc3f1c1b9e9】。
本文遵守【CC-BY 4.0】协议,转载请保留原文出处及本版权声明。
GreatSQL
GreatSQL社区 2023-01-31 加入
GreatSQL是由万里数据库维护的MySQL分支,专注于提升MGR可靠性及性能,支持InnoDB并行查询特性,是适用于金融级应用的MySQL分支版本。 社区:https://greatsql.cn/ Gitee: https://gitee.com/GreatSQL/GreatSQL
评论