Easysearch VS Opensearch 数据写入与存储性能对比

作者：极限实验室

2025-04-09
北京
本文字数：776 字
阅读完需：约 3 分钟

本文记录 Easysearch 和 Opensearch 数据写入和数据存储方面的性能对比。

准备

压测工具：INFINI Loadgen
对比版本：

Easysearch 1.11.1（lucene 8.11.4）
Opensearch 2.19.1（lucene 9.12.1）

节点 JVM 配置：1G

数据写入

压测命令：

./loadgen-linux-amd64 -c 20 -d 300

复制代码

Opensearch

PUT infinilabs{  "settings": {    "number_of_shards": "1",    "number_of_replicas": 0,    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",    "translog": {      "durability": "async",      "sync_interval": "120s"    }  }}

复制代码

Easysearch

PUT infinilabs{  "settings": {    "number_of_shards": "1",    "number_of_replicas": 0,    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",    "translog": {      "durability": "async",      "sync_interval": "120s"    }  }}

复制代码

数据存储

压测命令：

./loadgen-linux-amd64 -c 20 -d 600 -l 10000

复制代码

Opensearch: zstd 压缩

PUT infinilabs{  "settings": {    "number_of_shards": "1",    "number_of_replicas": 0,    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",    "translog": {      "durability": "async",      "sync_interval": "120s"    },    "index.codec": "zstd"  }}

复制代码

Easysearch: zstd + source_reuse 压缩

PUT infinilabs{  "settings": {    "number_of_shards": "1",    "number_of_replicas": 0,    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",    "translog": {      "durability": "async",      "sync_interval": "120s"    },    "index.codec": "ZSTD",    "index.source_reuse": "true"  }}