解决 Fragment 多层嵌套时 onActivityResult 无法正确回调的问题
public void startActivityForResult(Intent intent, int requestCode) {     if(this.mActivity == null) {         throw new IllegalStateException("Fragment " + this + " not attached to Activity");     } else {         this.mActivity.startActivityFromFragment(this, intent, requestCode);     } }
- 1 
- 2 
- 3 
- 4 
- 5 
- 6 
- 7 
- 8 
- 1 
- 2 
- 3 
- 4 
- 5 
- 6 
- 7 
- 8 
很明显直接调用了 FragmentActivity 的 startActivityFromFragment 方法
public void startActivityFromFragment(Fragment fragment, Intent intent, int requestCode) {     if(requestCode == -1) {         super.startActivityForResult(intent, -1);     } else if((requestCode & -65536) != 0) {         throw new IllegalArgumentException("Can only use lower 16 bits for requestCode");     } else {         super.startActivityForResult(intent, (fragment.mIndex + 1 << 16) + (requestCode & '\uffff'));     } }
- 1 
- 2 
- 3 
- 4 
- 5 
- 6 
- 7 
- 8 
- 9 
- 1 
- 2 
- 3 
- 4 
- 5 
- 6 
- 7 
- 8 
- 9 
在这里将 requestCode 和 Fragment 的 mIndex 融合成了一个整型作为新的 requestCode,那么新的 requestCode 的高 16 位表示 Fragment 的索引,低 16 为表示原本的 requestCode,看来这里是用 Fragment 的 mIndex 作为查找依据的
接下来再看 FragmentActivity 的 onActivityResult 方法
protected void onActivityResult(int requestCode, int resultCode, Intent data) {     this.mFragments.noteStateNotSaved();     int index = requestCode >> 16;     if(index != 0) {         --index;         if(this.mFragments.mActive != null && index >= 0 && index < this.mFragments.mActive.size()) {             Fragment frag = (Fragment)this.mFragments.mActive.get(index);             if(frag == null) {                 Log.w("FragmentActivity", "Activity result no fragment exists for index: 0x" + Integer.toHexString(requestCode));             } else {                 frag.onActivityResult(requestCode & '\uffff', resultCode, data);             }          } else {             Log.w("FragmentActivity", "Activity result fragment index out of range: 0x" + Integer.toHexString(requestCode));         }     } else {         super.onActivityResult(requestCode, resultCode, data);     } }
- 1 
- 2 
- 3 
- 4 
- 5 
- 6 
- 7 
- 8 
- 9 
- 10 
- 11 
- 12 
- 13 
- 14 
- 15 
- 16 
- 17 
- 18 
- 19 
- 20 
- 1 
- 2 
- 3 
- 4 
- 5 
- 6 
- 7 
- 8 
- 9 
- 10 
- 11 
- 12 
- 13 
- 14 
- 15 
- 16 
- 17 
- 18 
- 19 
- 20 
在这里取出 requestCode 的高 16 位,不等 0 就是子 Fragment 的 mIndex,但是接下来却直接从 Activity 的 Fragment 列表中根据索引去找 Fragment,如果你的 Fragment 是被子 Fragment 的 childFragmentManager 管理的话这样是绝对找不到的,于是乎答案很明了了。
解决问题:?
解决这个问题的办法有两个?
第一个是直接升级 support-v4 到 23.2.0 以上的版本,因为 23.2.0 以上就修复了这个 BUG,具体怎么解决的就不再赘述了有兴趣的可自行研究,但由于种种原因没办法升级 23.2.0 的还大有人在?
第二种办法就是自己动手丰衣足食,在 Fragment 层重写相关方法解决问题
接下来着重介绍自己动手丰衣足食的办法,完整实现如下:
`public class ForResultNestedCompatFragment extends Fragment { private ForResultNestedCompatFragment forResultChildFragment; @Override public void startActivityForResult(Intent intent, int requestCode) { Fragment parentFragment = getParentFragment(); if (parentFragment != null && parentFragment instanceof ForResultNestedCompatFragment) { ((ForResultNestedCompatFragment) parentFragment).startActivityForResultFromChildFragment(intent, requestCode, this); } else { forResultChildFragment = null; super.startActivityForResult(intent, requestCode); } } private void startActivityForResultFromChildFragment(Intent intent, int requestCode, ForResultNestedCompatFragment childFragment) { forResultChildFragment = childFragment; Fragment parentFragment = getParent
Fragment(); if (parentFragment != null && parentFragment instanceof ForResultNestedCompatFragment) { ((ForResultNestedCompatFragment) parentFragment).startActivityForResultFromChildFragment(intent, requestCode, this); } else { super.startActivityForResult(intent, requestCode); } } @Override public final void onActivityResult(int requestCode, int resultCode, Intent data) { if (forResultChildFragment != null) { forResultChildFragment.onActivityResult(requestCode, resultCode, data); forResultChildFragment = null; } else { onActivityResultNestedCompat(requestCode, resultCode, data); } } public void onActivityResultNestedCompat(int requestCode, int resultCode, Intent data) { } }`
- 1 
- 2 
- 3 
- 4 
- 5 
- 6 
- 7 
- 8 
- 9 
- 10 
- 11 
- 12 
- 13 
- 14 
- 15 
- 16 
- 17 
- 18 
- 19 
- 20 
- 21 
- 22 
- 23 
- 24 











 
    
评论